Monday, December 15, 2014

First Semester Summary Activity


Hello I am Battle; I am going to talk to you about what I have learned in the course of the semester.
 I was pleasantly surprised to learn about the history of leisure time and what they did during that time. Before learning about this, I just assumed that leisure time was always accepted and practiced, but that turned out to not be the case. At first, leisure time was looked at, as being lazy, but due to mechanization it gave the workers more time off of work, allowing them to have leisure time. I was also intrigued to learn about what they spent their time doing, for example the men spent their time in saloons and sporting events while the women spent their time shopping and going to tea rooms and luncheonettes.
 I was unpleasantly surprised to learn about how dangerous it was to live in the times of early city development. Some of the dangers of early city developments included: dangers of diseases and plague, extraordinary crowding of working-class neighbors, and especially fires. Fires became a serious problem in 1871 and destroyed cities like- Baltimore, Chicago, Boston, and San Francisco. The fires were a terrible and deadly experience to most, however on the positive side it encouraged the construction of fireproof buildings.
Something that I am likely to remember and be able to discuss in ten years from now, is slavery and the movies we watched about slavery including, 12 Years a Slave, and Glory. To read about slavery is bad enough, but to actually watch it, gave me a new perspective and made it that much gruesome.  I have always been intrigued to learn about slavery and to start out this course with learning about it through movies, was something that will stick with me forever.
 Americans in the past used to, and still today, talk and debate about Native Americans. In several events such as the Concentration policy of 1851, where each tribe was assigned its own defined reservation, Wounded Knee of 1890 where a fight broke out between the Indians and the white soldiers, and Assimilation where they forced the Indians to be Christians and adopt the ways of the white man we can reflect on the mistreating of Indians . Even thought all of that is well in the past, conversation and debate is still brought up today for example in sports. There is a debate about whether or not Native American mascots, such as; chiefs, warriors, and especially redskins are derogatory to Native Americans and their culture. After I researched I learned from a member of a Chippewas tribe that they did not consider Native American mascots offensive (besides the redskins) as long as it was being used respectfully and appropriately. It intrigued me that though this began so long ago it is still commonly talked and debated about today.

I would name the era from 1865 to 1920 the “Building Era” because this is when America became more modernized in the way they worked, lived, and constructed. Through this time period, skyscrapers were invented which allowed buildings to not take up as much space on land making it cheaper to construct. other inventions included: airplanes, cars, and even magazines for clothes, which now does not necessarily seem like a big deal, but in those times, it seemed to the people to be astonishing.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Thinking About Success

Battle B

In ranking the words: luck, opportunity, skill, and hard work, from most to least importance I think the order should be: hard work, opportunity, skill, luck. Hard work is the most important because, you have to have it, if you have opportunities but do not work hard then you waste your opportunity. If you have skill but do not work hard at your skill , then you waste your skill. If you have luck, that is great, but luck will only get you so far. This is why hard work is the most important, it lays out a good foundation for the opportunities that you come across, skill that you have, and luck that you get.


Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Fast Fashion Controversy

Battle B

      There have been many different views on fast fashion that have lead to much controversy, for those who do not know what fast fashion is, it is where the consumer gets the look of the latest fashion seen on cat walks, for lower quality, faster, and price. The goal is, because of the fast pace of different items of clothing coming in and out, the costumer feels the need to buy it so they do not waste their opportunity and regret not getting it down the road. However some people compare fast fashion to fast food, addictive but not all together good for you. Zara (the creator of the idea of fast fashion) has gotten in many law suits because they imitate fashion of other designers and selling it for cheap, but what they are doing is completely legal. Some people feel that Zara and other companies like Zara are cheating for being able to dopy another persons idea, changing it a little but, and then selling it for less quality and money and reaping the benefits. Others believe it to be perfectly okay and legal because they make some changes to the clothing, and people want the look for not the high price they should be able to have it.

Fast Fashion

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Dear Family,

            I have completed my journey to America and am writing this letter to you all from New York.  There are so many people here, mostly like my self, immigrants; though I am not sure where they are from, they seem friendly. I love it here. The challenges so far have been to find people with my language, the diet change, and finding a job.
            Though there are many who do not speak the same language as me I have found a small group who does, they are very nice and helpful to me and have accepted me very graciously. American food is different then I was expecting and even though it is not as good as yours mom, it is not awful, as far as job the small group that I was talking about has helped me get small job as a clerk, it is not a ton of money but it will work for now.
            Even through some of the hardship I am so happy I decided to make the decision to come to America, I see the true Americans and look at them with such aw, it makes me want to be an American too, at least as much as I can be. I hope the day comes when you all make the journey too so you van enjoy this beautiful country as much as I have, I will try to write to you as much as I can.
                                                            Sincerely,
                                                                       Battle B

                                                                        

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Native American Mascot Controversy

Redskin, most controversy on their mascot
                                         

Chippewas, supported by the actual Chippewas tribe.
                                   

Florida State University, The  Seminoles 
                                       

Cleveland Indians, a baseball team
                                                 
A Baseball team with an Indian mascot

                                         

Battle Black



This source was helpful because it shows both why Native American mascots should be banned and why they should not be banned.


The society page was helpful because it gave me a lot of background history and information of mascots and Native American mascots.


This source was the most helpful because it gave me a firsthand look and opinion from a guy who represents a tribe and their view point.  


This article was helpful because like the ESPN interview, I got the opinion from an actual Native American.


This website offers an interesting view point on the debate.

     
Post on Native Americans view from an event at the National Museum of the American Indian which held a day long conference on the use of Native American imagery in sports.


Battle Black
USH

                                                Native American Mascots

            The question of whether or not Native American mascots are honoring or dishonoring Native Americans has come up quiet frequently, even though there are many different opinions I believe that Native American mascots are not degrading towards Native Americans because it honors them, and reminds us of our history. With this being said however I do believe that the football team name, the Redskins is derogatory and should in fact be changed.

            Native American mascots are not degrading Native Americans because it honors them, the word mascot is derived from the French word “mascotte” and Portuguese word “masco” meaning that it is a person or object that brings good luck to a particular person, household, and later to a team.  Having a Native American as a mascot should be taken as an honor and privilege to them because it exemplifies what that particular team wants and aims to be like. Teams choose mascots of things they respect and things they want their program to embrace, and having a Native American as a mascot means the school wants to embrace bravery, respect, courageousness, wisdom, and perseverance. In an Interview between Paul Lukas (works for ESPN) and Frank Cloutier (represents the Chippewas tribe), Paul asks what is Frank and his tribes position on Native American imagery, Frank answers, “…Our position is that if it’s not derogatory and it’s being used appropriately with an opportunity to share or cross-share our culture, then it’s fine. There’s nothing derogatory about “Warriors” or “Braves.” There’s nothing derogatory about “Indian” but terms like “Redskin” or “Half-Breed” those are derogatory terms to us.” This information shows that, besides the term “Redskin,” Native American imagery (including mascots) are not degrading to Native Americans but that they are honoring them. 
            Another example of why Native American Mascots are not degrading to Native Americans is because it reminds us of our history. Having Native American mascots is one of the ways we again honor Native Americans and how we honor and show are respect towards them and educate America. For example in the same interview between Paul Lukas and Frank Cloutier, Paul asks, “So when you say it’s fine to use non-derogatory imagery as long as it’s being used appropriately, you’re saying that part of that “appropriate use” is educational content about Native Americans.” Frank answers this by saying, “yes. For example, in 2003 we entered into an articulation agreement with Central Michigan University because they were the Chippewas. As part of that agreement, the tribe and the university each has an obligation. Every year I go in and address every freshman athletic student about our culture and what it means to be a Chippewas, and abut the proud, competitive nature of our people. We explain that it’s not about war paint and fake feathers. It’s about honoring the triumph of these resilient, competitive people.” Even though this is a long quote I felt it was necessary because it shows a first hand opinion on the issue, and that without Native American Mascot, it’s a missed opportunity for the type of cultural exchange and education.
            Native American mascots are not derogatory to Native Americans because if used appropriately it is honoring and used to bring good luck to them team and exemplifies what that team wants to embrace. Also it reminds us of our history, bring cultural exchange, and is a great opportunity to educate our society.